Preliminary Syllabus - Fall 2000
Course Description & Objectives:
This course will be devoted to a detailed investigation of American foreign policy. Specifically, we will examine some of the contemporary foreign policy issues facing the US and how the participants in the foreign policy process handle current policy challenges. To do so, we will first discuss some key concepts of US foreign policymaking. These fundamentals include the structure of the international system of nation-states, national power and interests, the historical context of American foreign policy, relevant actors in US foreign affairs, models of foreign policy decision making, and the tools of foreign policymaking. We will then focus on how US foreign policy varies by region of the world as well as on some "new" issue areas that are of great concern to US policymakers-the challenge of collective security, the global economy and world trade, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, human rights, humanitarian interventionism, international terrorism, and the international narcotics trade. The objective of this course is to confer upon you an understanding of how knowledge of the past, the global policy environment, the actors and processes of foreign policy decision making, and the specifics of the particular issue under consideration all come together to help determine US foreign policy in the modern world. In the process of accomplishing this course objective, I hope to also confer upon you an understanding of how American foreign policy affects you, the individual citizen.
Course Requirements, Policies, & Grading:
The course has been divided into five sections. For each of sections two through five, each student will select one of the sub-topics of that section and write a short essay on that topic (each of about 5 pages of text excluding endnotes and references; typed, double-spaced, 12pt font, 1" page margins; with within-text citations, endnotes, and a list of all references; generally following the standards established in commonly accepted style manuals). To receive any grade above a B-, a student must produce a thoughtful, comprehensive, and well-written essay that borrows ideas and arguments from the assigned readings as well as from "outside" source material to critically analyze the subject.
The course will also include a comprehensive final exam. This exam will be a take-home exam, and will consist of several short-essay-answer questions. To facilitate preparation for this exam (as well as to generate some debate), the class period following the completion of each of sections two through five has been set aside for a comprehensive discussion of the preceding section of course material. A list of questions drawn from that section's course material will be provided a few days ahead of time so that students may prepare themselves for a lively class period of discussion and debate. Active student participation in these "review" sessions is expected, and will be the basis upon which the "class participation" grade is decided. In addition to active class participation, a good class attendance record is also expected through the entire course.
Grades will be based on the following distribution scheme:
Short essay #1: 15 % Short essay #2: 15 % Short essay #3: 15 % Short essay #4: 15 % Class participation: 10 % Comprehensive final exam: 30 % 98 -100 % A+ 94 - 97 % A 91 - 93 % A- 88 - 90 % B+ 83 - 87 % B 79 - 82 % B- 76 - 78 % C+ 72 - 75 % C 68 - 71 % C- 51 - 67 % D 0 - 50 % FAll students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic honesty and integrity. Any act of academic dishonesty or misconduct will be referred to the Office of the Dean. For further information, see Carleton College's Academic Honesty in the Writing of Essays and Other Papers and the section on "academic honesty" in Academic Regulations and Procedures, 2000-01. Both are available in Laird 140.
Special needs: Students requiring access to learning tools or special schedules approved by Student Support Services should contact me at the beginning of the course.
Reading Assignments:
You are expected to keep up with the reading assignments as we go through the term, which means that you are supposed to read each assignment before the corresponding class period. The class lectures and discussions are meant to build upon the assigned reading material.
The following four required texts are available at the bookstore:
[1] Hastedt, Glenn P. 2000. American Foreign Policy: Past, Present, Future. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [GPH henceforth.]
[2] Rubinstein, Alvin Z. 1994. America's National Interest in a Post-Cold War World: Issues and Dilemmas. New York: McGraw-Hill. [AZR henceforth.]
[3] Rai, Kul B., David F. Walsh, and Paul J. Best (ed.). 1997. America in the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities in Foreign Policy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [RWB henceforth.]
[4] Hastedt, Glenn P (ed.). 2000. Annual Editions: American Foreign Policy, 00/01. 6th ed. Guilford, CT: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill. [AE henceforth.]
Section I: Basic Concepts of Foreign Policy
W 9/13 - The international systemic context: AZR 1; GPH 1; RWB 1.
The emerging foreign policy agenda: GPH 2 & 17:390-8.
F 9/15 - National power, national interests, and foreign policy: AZR 2 & 3; AE 2 & 5.
Richard N. Haass. 1999. "Chapter 1. Beyond Containment: Competing American Foreign Policy Doctrines for the New Era." The Future of American Foreign Policy, 3rd Ed., ed. Eugene R. Wittkopf and Christopher M. Jones. New York: St. Martin's/Worth.
M 9/18 - The historical context of the Cold War: RWB 2; GPH 4 & 5.
Section II: The US Foreign Affairs Establishment
W 9/20 - The domestic context of American foreign policy: GPH 6; AE 15.
F 9/22 - The Constitution and American foreign policy: GPH 7; AE 18.
M 9/25 - The Presidency and foreign policy: GPH 8; AE 19 & 20.
Congress and foreign policy: GPH 9.
W 9/27 - The foreign affairs bureaucracy: GPH 10; AE 21 & 22.
F 9/29 - [Review session for Section II-discussion and debate.]
Section III: Foreign Policy Making
M 10/2 - Models of foreign policy decision making: GPH 11 & 12.
[Short essay #1 due by 4 PM.]
W 10/4 - Instruments of foreign policy-diplomacy: GPH 13; AE 25 & 27.
Richard N. Haass and Meghan L. O'Sullivan. 2000. "Engaging Problem Countries." Brookings Institution Policy Brief 61 (6/2000).
F 10/6 - Instruments of foreign policy-covert action: GPH 14.
Walter Pincus. 1997. "CIA Turns to Boutique Operations, Covert Action Against Terrorism, Drugs, Arms." The Washington Post (9/14/1997).
M 10/9 - Instruments of foreign policy-economic instruments: GPH 15; AE 26, 29, & 30.
David E. Sanger and Richard W. Stevenson. 2000. "5.4 Second-Guessing the Economic Doctor." Global Politics in a Changing World: A Reader, ed. Richard W. Mansbach and Edward Rhodes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
W 10/11 - Instruments of foreign policy-military power: GPH 16; AE 32 & 33.
Richard N. Haass. 1999. "The Use and Abuse of Military Force." Brookings Institution Policy Brief 54 (11/1999).
F 10/13 - [Review session for Section III-discussion and debate.]
M 10/16 - [Midterm break.]
T 10/17 - [Short essay #2 due by 4 PM.]
Section IV: The "New" Foreign Policy Agenda
W 10/18 - National character, values, and American foreign policy: GPH 3; AE 3, 4, & 17.
Fareed Zakaria. 2000. "A.2 Our Hollow Hegemony: Why Foreign Policy Can't Be Left to the Market." Global Politics in a Changing World: A Reader, ed. Richard W. Mansbach and Edward Rhodes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Human rights and American foreign policy: AZR 4.
Aryeh Neier. 1997. "The New Double Standard." Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Foreign Policy 105 (Winter 1996-97).
F 10/20 - Humanitarian interventionism: AZR 5; AE 9, 13, & 34.
Chantal de Jonge Oudraat. 2000. "Intervention in Internal Conflicts: Legal and Political Conundrums." Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Global Policy Program Working Papers 15 (8/2000).Collective security: AZR 13.
James Goodby. 1996. "Chapter 16. Can Collective Security Work?: Reflections on the European Case." Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to International Conflict, ed. Chester A. Crocker and Fen Osler Hampson with Pamela Aall. Washington: U.S. Institute of Peace.
M 10/23 - International terrorism: AE 31.
US Dept. of State. 2000. "Introduction." Patterns of Global Terrorism: 1999.The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction: AZR 12; AE 36.
The international narcotics trade: AZR 6.
Harry W. Shlaudeman and W. Kenneth Thompson. 1996. "In Washington, Maintaining Pressure." The Foreign Service Journal (10/1996).
W 10/25 - The global economy and world trade: AZR 8; AE 28.
Richard W. Mansbach and Edward Rhodes (ed.). 2000. "Chapter 9: Managing a Global Economy." Global Politics in a Changing World: A Reader. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
F 10/27 - [Review session for Section IV-discussion and debate.]
Section V: Regional Foreign Policy Concerns
M 10/30 - Western Europe and the European Union: AZR 9:177-89; RWB 3; AE 7 & 8.
Bruce Stokes. 1997. "Bank On It." National Journal (1/4/1997).[Short essay #3 due by 4 PM.]
W 11/1 - Eastern Europe and Russia: AZR 10; RWB 4; AE 6 & 10.
Susan L. Woodward. 1996. "America's Bosnia Policy: The Work Ahead." Brookings Institution Policy Brief 2 (7/1996).
F 11/3 - Africa: RWB 9; AE 14.
Latin America: RWB 7.Howard J. Wiarda. 1999. "Chapter 19. Back to Basics: Reassessing U.S. Policy in Latin America." The Future of American Foreign Policy, 3rd Ed., ed. Eugene R. Wittkopf and Christopher M. Jones. New York: St. Martin's/Worth.
M 11/6 - The Middle East: AZR 11; RWB 8; AE 12.
TBA.
W 11/8 - East Asia: AZR 9:189-99; RWB 5; AE 11.
Richard N. Haass and Nicholas Lardy. 1997. "The United States and China: A New Framework." Brookings Institution Policy Brief 25 (10/1997).Arthur Waldron. 2000. "Menacing Language from China." American Enterprise Institute On the Issues (3/2000).
Nicholas Eberstadt. 2000. "What's North Korea Up To?" American Enterprise Institute On the Issues (7/2000).
F 11/10 - South Asia: RWB 6.
Srini Sitaraman. 1999. "Entanglements and Estrangements: Sources of Discord and Accommodation in U.S.-India Relations." Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies 22 (2): 16-37.Stephen P. Cohen. 2000. "A New Beginning in South Asia." Brookings Institution Policy Brief 55 (1/2000).
M 11/13 - [Review session for Section V-discussion and debate.]
T 11/14 - [Short essay #4 due by 4 PM.]
W 11/15 - Future directions for American foreign policy: AZR 14; GPH 18.
[Final exam to be handed out.]
M 11/20 - [Final exam due by 4 PM.]